• Movie Review: Cloverfield

    Cloverfield movie reviewCloverfield (2008) Rated "PG-13"
    Starring Lizzy Caplan, Jessica Lucas, T.J. Miller, Michael Stahl-David
    Directed by Matt Reeves
    Reviewed by Nicholas Ozment
    Rating: (4/5):

    I grew up watching Godzilla movies (still love 'em!), but not because they were even for a moment scary. No, by the time I was born the big radioactive lizard had long since devolved into self-parody. People like me watch Godzilla movies because it's amusing to see guys in rubber monster suits toss each other around while knocking down model skyscrapers and swatting toy airplanes.

    But watching Cloverfield, I got a sense of what the Japanese filmmakers of the original 1954 Gojira were really trying to convey: The sheer horror of being caught in a wave of brutal, unstoppable, massive destruction?trapped in the epicenter, trying to cling to survival in the face of an event that reduces you to the scale of an ant?as a little boy brings his sneaker down on your anthill.

    The problem with previous giant monster movies, even the most well done, is that the camera pans back and shows us the little boy stomping on the ants--the camera's omniscient POV turns it into a spectacle. Principal characters may be running around underfoot carrying out subplots, but for all intents and purposes it feels like they're in a different movie, inconsequential to the real action.

    When Godzilla topples a building over, do we give a moment's thought to the imaginary people inside it? Cloverfield puts us inside the building. It sets us right down in the middle of the street to dodge falling debris and duck rifle shells as mobs flee in panic and the infantry rolls in. It does this, Blair Witch style, by giving one of our characters a camera coupled with the conviction that someone needs to document all this to the bitter end. Our main characters, six Manhattan twenty-somethings, react believably to the mounting horror, knowing as little as we do, capturing scraps of information from glimpses of news reports, overheard conversations of military personnel (who seem to be about as baffled as everyone else), and horrifying firsthand experience. Director Matt Reeves and his cast convey this exceedingly well, especially in the first third of the film, before we ever see the monster.

    And yes, we do get to see the monster, notably in one up-close-and-personal shot near the end. But that scene felt almost gratuitous, and I would say unnecessary. Far more disturbing are the fleeting glimpses.

    The tension of trying to find safety in a city that has become part natural disaster, part war zone is palpable, and the scene in the dark subway tunnels is a classic of the horror genre. The run-in with the CDC unit is a whole different kind of scary, and man, the film just delivers one virtuoso scene after another. Most importantly, though, for all this to be really effective, is that the characters are believable, and we develop a connection with them that is essential in horror films--we must be rooting for the protagonists for their peril to affect us and draw us in to their terror.

    Perhaps Cloverfield manages to tap into some vestige of the terror of those first few hours after the 9/11 attacks, when it was obvious someone was unleashing death and destruction in the heart of America, but nobody seemed to have any idea who it was.

    Post-Hiroshima Japan had Gojira. Post-9/11 America has Cloverfield. It's not just the first giant-monster movie that actually managed to terrify me. It's one of the scariest horror movies I've seen in a long time. And yeah, it's lots of fun.

    P.S. Keep an eye on the skyline in that final little piece of footage filmed from the Ferris wheel.




    Comments 5 Comments
    1. H.P. Lovesauce's Avatar
      "Most importantly, though, for all this to be really effective, is that the characters are believable, and we develop a connection with them that is essential in horror films--we must be rooting for the protagonists for their peril to affect us and draw us in to their terror."

      I'm afraid I grew too antsy a half-hour into the film; I stopped praying the monster would show up and destroy these idiotic, self-absorbed twits, and instead gave up and switched the movie off. I wish I had your stamina, Oz.
    1. darkbow's Avatar
      Didn't love it, didn't hate it. Though I did think it had more potential than it reached. I loved the idea behind it, but ... well, the editing and directing weren't that good. And the characters were unmemorable.
    1. Ropespor's Avatar
      "I wish I had your stamina, Oz."--H.P. Lovesauce

      H.P., if you check out some of the other reviews of movies I've sat through (i.e. Primeval or Bug), you'll know that one thing I have for these sorts of movies is stamina!

      Darkbow, My estimation of the film should also be put in the context of a whole slew of really crappy horror films that I endured in the months prior to Cloverfield. By comparison, it was a breath of fresh air (and my standards for this particular genre are, admittedly, adjusted a bit lower). By way of contrast, I felt the same apathy about the protagonists in The Ruins that you did for the characters here.

      Hey, guys, thanks for commenting! So, the trick to getting comments on these reviews, it looks like, is to review films other people have actually seen!
    1. Markctf's Avatar
      Quote Originally Posted by darkbow View Post
      Didn't love it, didn't hate it. Though I did think it had more potential than it reached. I loved the idea behind it, but ... well, the editing and directing weren't that good. And the characters were unmemorable.
      Agreed -- the characters weren't memorable at all. The film focused not on charater development, but just one thing: who's going to survive? Some stories are character driven, others are plot driven. Any movie featuring a monster tends to be plot driven, because having a character deal with his fatal personality flaw while a monster eats his leg doesn't quite work. So while I agree with you, it wasn't the focus of the film.
    1. darkbow's Avatar
      Maybe the characters weren't the focus of the film, but (SPOILER) those huddled together at the end awaiting their soon demise ... guess what? There was no reason for me to care for any of them. They weren't even people, from a characterization point of view. Heck, I would've felt more sympathy for redshirts.

      Robespor, about The Ruins ... I've yet to see the movie, but I did read the novel, and I loved it. Sounds as if the movie was a pretty straight adaption. The plot was fairly standard B movie stuff, as were the characters, so nothing great there. BUT, what the novel had in spades was pacing. Truly, it was the best paced horror novel I've read in years. Every time you keep thinking, "man, this situation can't get any worse," and then it does. And then it does it again. And again. And, yep, even again.